Vinta Nanda watches India’s Cockroach movement transform youth anger into irreverent resistance, challenging political power, institutional silence, celebrity culture and older generations while revealing how humour, technology and authenticity are redefining dissent today.

I have been watching from the sidelines. And what I have just witnessed in India may turn out to be about much more than an Education Minister resigning, an examination paper leak, an agitation at Jantar Mantar, or even a government being forced to concede ground.

Something far more profound appears to have shifted. A generation has arrived which does not seem particularly interested in being afraid.

For more than a decade, India watched its vocabulary change. There was a time when Kiran Rao’s anxiety about the atmosphere in the country, articulated publicly by Aamir Khan, became a national controversy. It was a moment that told the cultural establishment something important: expressing discomfort could carry consequences. Gradually, the vocabulary of intimidation became normalised.

Liberals became “urban naxals”. Journalists were abused and discredited. Artists, filmmakers, academics and activists discovered that criticism could mean trolling, exclusion, threats, loss of opportunity or professional isolation.

Some continued speaking and paid for it. Some accepted marginalisation. Some grew thick skins. And many simply learnt to shut up. The entertainment industry understood the message particularly well. Bollywood, barring exceptions, became cautious. Celebrities discovered the safety of ambiguity. Silence became an extremely sophisticated survival strategy.

Over time, even resistance became exhausted. After the 2024 General Election, among many people I knew, the question was no longer, “What can we do?” It was: “What is the point?” That distinction matters. Because hopelessness is perhaps the most effective instrument of power. You don't necessarily have to silence people if you can convince them that speaking makes no difference.

Meanwhile, public distrust of institutions deepened. Investigative agencies, electoral processes, tax authorities, media organisations and other pillars of democracy were increasingly accused by critics of bending before political power. Small and medium businesses struggled through economic disruptions while enormous corporations appeared ever more powerful. Technology raced forward, yet millions of young Indians wondered why opportunity was not racing towards them with equal speed.

When Cockroaches Became A Movement

And then somebody used the word cockroaches. What followed was something nobody seemed prepared for. Abhijeet Dipke, sitting thousands of kilometres away in Boston, seized upon the insult and transformed it into satire.

The Cockroach Janta Party — CJP — was born. And the joke escaped its creator. It became a language. Then a community. Then a protest. And finally, something resembling a movement.

Young Indians began gathering around frustrations that were painfully real to them: examination leaks, unemployment, uncertainty, corruption and the terrifying possibility that after doing everything they had been told to do — study, compete, qualify, wait — there might still be no fair doorway through which they could enter their own future.

Their first great demand became unmistakable: accountability from Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. They came out in hundreds. Then thousands. Then far more. Delhi was no longer the only stage. The anger travelled. And eventually, Dharmendra Pradhan resigned.

Why The Old Weapons Failed

That is where the story becomes fascinating. Because the important question isn't merely what happened?

It is: Why didn't the old weapons work? Why didn't ridicule work? Why didn't intimidation work? Why didn't television narratives work? Why didn't political labelling work? Why didn't the enormous communications machinery surrounding conventional power succeed in overwhelming a movement born substantially from phones, memes, jokes and young people refusing to behave respectfully before authority?

Perhaps because Gen Z doesn't consume authority the way previous generations did. And perhaps those of us who belong to older generations have not understood this yet.

We grew up believing institutions possessed gravity. They grew up watching institutions become content.

We feared headlines. They make memes out of them.

We were terrified of being mocked. They weaponise mockery.

We worried about respectability. They ask who decided what was respectable in the first place. And this changes everything.

Irreverence Became Their Greatest Weapon

The most devastating weapon used by the Cockroach generation wasn't rage. It was irreverence.

You can counter an ideology with another ideology. You can answer a political speech with another political speech. You can send spokespersons onto television channels. You can unleash armies of social-media warriors. But what do you do when millions of people start laughing at you?

Power understands opposition. Power understands rebellion. Power even understands revolution. What power finds much harder to process is becoming the punchline.

That, to me, is what made this moment extraordinary.

The flood of memes, reels, jokes, videos and merciless commentary did something that decades of solemn political discourse had struggled to accomplish. It stripped politics of its costume.

Suddenly everybody was fair game. Politicians. Bureaucrats. Media personalities. Corporations. Celebrities. Parents. Liberals. Conservatives. The Right. The Left. And yes, even those of us who had spent years believing that because we had once resisted, questioned or protested, history automatically placed us on the correct side.

Gen Z isn't offering anybody that certificate. That may be its greatest strength. This movement was political precisely because it refused to behave like politics. It did not appear to need the traditional grammar of a political movement to become powerful. It was fuelled by specific grievances and demands, but its cultural force came from refusing the rituals through which older generations understand dissent.

Celebrity Could Not Capture Gen Z

Even celebrities couldn't capture the moment. Some tried. But celebrity itself suddenly seemed beside the point.

You cannot manufacture authenticity for a generation trained from childhood to detect advertising. You cannot market rebellion to people who understand marketing. You cannot sell them a story without their examining who paid for the story.

I find this particularly fascinating because I have spent my life around storytelling, cinema, television, advertising, communications and culture. Everything we learnt about persuasion is being rewritten. Advertising is scrambling to understand this generation but how will it ever do when it is controlled by political ideologies that reek bias’? Marketing is scrambling. Cinema is scrambling. News media is scrambling. Politics is scrambling. Economics will have to scramble too.

Because this generation doesn't merely want products. It wants accountability from the companies manufacturing them. It doesn't merely want employment. It wants to know why prosperity belongs disproportionately to somebody else. It doesn't merely want representation. It wants participation. And it doesn't automatically respect hierarchy simply because hierarchy announces itself.

The Revolution Entered Indian Homes

That is terrifying for every old system. Including families. One story told to me captures this beautifully. A parent, a hardcore RSS ideologue whose children joined the movement, told me, “After the theft in Ram Mandir, I was left with no further argument. Today I’m happy my children are standing for change.”

Think about that.

The revolution wasn't happening between political parties anymore. It had entered the dining room. Children were interrogating their parents. Students were interrogating institutions. Young citizens were interrogating governments. And an entire generation was interrogating the silence of the generations preceding it.

That last interrogation may prove the most uncomfortable. Because those of us who watched India change over the last twelve years will eventually have to answer a question:

What did we do while it was happening?

Some fought. Some spoke. Some suffered. Some lost careers and incomes. Some kept writing. Some kept documenting. But many adjusted. Many rationalised. Many decided survival was enough. Many who privately disagreed publicly disappeared. Perhaps Gen Z has looked at all of us and decided that it wants no part of that bargain.

Can Generation Obsolete Really Change?

Which brings me to the old fogies. And I include my generation in the question.

Can we make the 180-degree turn required of us? Can political parties become almost unrecognisable from what they are today? Can institutions recover credibility? Can journalism rediscover courage? Can businesses understand that endless concentration of wealth cannot coexist indefinitely with millions of educated, connected and increasingly impatient young people?

Can cinema speak without constantly calculating consequences? Can celebrities stop imagining themselves as leaders of conversations they arrived late to? Can parents accept that obedience is no longer necessarily considered a virtue?

And can liberals resist the temptation to appropriate this generation simply because, for one glorious moment, it appears to be saying things they wanted somebody to say?

Because Gen Z doesn't belong to us either.

That is the point. It belongs to itself.

Armed With Humour, Not Weapons

There is something wonderfully dangerous about a generation armed not with weapons but with cameras, broadband, humour, information, screenshots, receipts and an almost pathological intolerance for hypocrisy.

Violence can be condemned. Leaders can be arrested. Organisations can be banned. But how exactly do you arrest a joke? How do you lathi-charge a meme? How do you censor millions of private conversations? How do you intimidate people whose response to intimidation is to turn the intimidator into tomorrow morning's reel?

The Cockroach movement may evolve, fragment, disappoint or disappear. Every spontaneous movement eventually confronts the difficult transition from protest to structure, from anger to solutions, from mobilisation to institution-building.

So it would be premature to romanticise it. But what has already happened cannot easily be unhappened. A generation has discovered something extraordinarily important.

It can make power respond. And once citizens discover that, democracy changes.

WATCH THE LATEST #BMGT WITH PRATIBHA SUMAN IN DA HOUSE

The Phone Was Never Distraction

Maybe the real significance of the Cockroach movement isn't that it brought one minister down. Maybe it brought an assumption down. The assumption that nothing could change. The assumption that fear would always win. The assumption that young Indians were too distracted, too addicted to their phones, too apolitical, too consumed by influencers and entertainment to organise themselves around something larger.

Perhaps we misunderstood the phone. We thought it was distracting them from the world. They were using it to understand the world. We thought memes were frivolous. They were developing a political language. We thought reels were entertainment. They were building communications networks. We thought humour meant they weren't serious. We failed to understand that humour was the weapon.

And perhaps most deliciously of all, somebody called them cockroaches expecting the word to diminish them. They picked it up, wore it and marched with it.

That is the mistake every ageing establishment eventually makes. It thinks it gets to name the next generation. Until the next generation takes the insult, turns it into an identity and sends the bill back.

Gen Z Puts Gen O On Notice

So, from where I stand, watching advertising, marketing, storytelling, economics, politics, social structures and celebrity culture desperately recalibrating themselves around a generation that refuses to behave according to the old rules, I have only this to say: Bravo, Gen Z.

You took the word cockroach and made survival a political statement. You turned ridicule into resistance. You turned humour into power. And you have put Gen O — Generation Obsolete — on notice. Now comes the harder part. 

Don't become us. Good luck.